Results Delivered
$400 Million Settlement
Published Date: October 25, 2023
Peckar & Abramson is proud to have represented Flatiron/Dragados LLC in the achievement of the $400 million settlement announced by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) on October 12, 2023 arising out of the construction of the new Harbor Bridge in Corpus Christi, Texas. In addition to settling all outstanding disputes and damage claims, TxDOT also removed the Notice of Default it [...] Read More
No Damages
Published Date: April 19, 2023
P&A’s New York lawyers secured a favorable judgment in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The case involved claims by a New York hemp seed broker alleging that our client, a Colorado hemp grower, sold it defective hemp seeds. The broker, who resold the hemp seeds for a profit to third-party farmers, sought to [...] Read More
An Important Precedent
Published Date: April 11, 2023
P&A’s New Jersey lawyers secured a favorable judgment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Our attorneys successfully defended a claim for single employer and alter ego status wherein a labor union’s benefit funds filed a complaint seeking to bind our client, a paving contractor in the New York City area, to a collective [...] Read More
A Case of First Impression
Published Date: May 21, 2018
In a case of first impression, P&A represented a general contractor, whose home office is in Maryland, with respect to a project in New Jersey. A subcontractor brought a lawsuit against the general contractor in state court in New Jersey. The subcontract between P&A’s client and the subcontractor identified Maryland as the choice of venue. P&A first removed the case [...] Read More
Bench Trial Success
Published Date: August 18, 2017
Peckar & Abramson's Houston lawyers secured a judgment in the Harris County District Court. Our attorneys successfully defended a claim for wrongful termination and delay damages brought by a subcontractor against our highway contractor client and its payment bond surety. P&A's client was also counterclaiming for excess completion costs. Peckar & Abramson tried the case to the bench in late [...] Read More
